The Savage Curtain by: Gene Roddenberry and Arthur Heinemann, from a story by: Gene Roddenberry, and directed by: Herschel Daugherty

 

“The Savage Curtain” is written by: Gene Roddenberry and Arthur Heinemann, from a story by: Gene Roddenberry, and is directed by: Herschel Daugherty.  It was filmed under production code 77, was the 22^nd episode of Star Trek Season 3, the 77^th episode of Star Trek, and was broadcast on March 7, 1969.

 

Gene Roddenberry’s writer and story credit has filled me with a sense of dread and not since “The Omega Glory” has there been an episode this dire.  “The Savage Curtain” is an episode that once again because Roddenberry is a patriot for the United States of America as the best country in the world which is especially ironic considering this is an episode that went out during the early days of the Nixon administration.  It’s very easy to see where this patriotism came from, President Lyndon B. Johnson was largely seen through his Great Society as incredibly progressive making social change possible in response to the Civil Rights Movement, although Johnson was responsible for invading Vietnam and escalating the Vietnam War something Star Trek was critical towards.  1969 as a year could be historically described as a year where the swinging nature of the 1960s shattered: Richard Nixon taking office brought Republican power as the Republican Party’s base was undergoing a shift that began in 1964 making it the far right at best fascist adjacent party it is today, the anti-war movement was at its peak with Nixon beginning troop withdrawls after several disasters of the previous administration though the war would and essentially leaving Vietnam with many problems the United States had caused, and the fall would see the Manson murders be the culmination of the decade.  The early 1970s would be rocked with political scandal to fuel rightful distrust in a government including Watergate and the publishing of The Pentagon Papers.

 

“The Savage Curtain” as an episode is Roddenberry attempting to make a statement on the nature of good vs. evil by presenting figures from real and fictional history of the Star Trek universe and making them fight for a race of rock creatures in an episode that ends on the exclamation that good and evil are actually similar because they use the same methods when forced to fight.  This barely gets a refutation from Kirk and Spock who are included in the battle because they represent the current society.  It’s also a conclusion that feels fundamentally at odds with Star Trek’s own philosophy: this is a show that has largely refuted the ideas of pure good and evil, creating recurring villains that are largely given inner lives and sympathies in episodes such as “Balance of Terror” and even whenever the Klingons appear.  Using methodology to create similarity in philosophy is also just ridiculous because the methodology of two parties fighting on an essentially barren planet in a conflict they have been conscripted into by a literal higher power, and by having one party made up of people who aren’t really there.  There’s a hint that Roddenberry understands that at the very end, but this episode was also co-written by Arthur Heinemann who very easily could have seen what Roddenberry was proposing and attempted to damage control Roddenberry’s messaging, especially since this was both the third from last episode to enter production and third from last to air.

 

This is a bad message and it compounds with Roddenberry’s patriotism because the main historical figure from actual history is Abraham Lincoln, taken from a projection in Kirk’s mind of one of the great historical figures.  The historical figure from Spock’s mind is the founder of Vulcan society, Surak.  The episode actually opens with Lincoln appearing on the viewscreen and asking to come aboard the Enterprise hence an utterly ridiculous image that perhaps had the most potential to reflect on history.  Lincoln is clearly a historical figure Roddenberry admires, and largely for good reason.  I cannot discount Lincoln’s leadership through the American Civil War and his abolitionist stance, but this is also an episode from 1969 so it very much is ascribing to the Great Man theory of history.  Abraham Lincoln was very much an integral figure in the history of the United States of America and Earth’s history in general, and one of the better presidents, but this is an episode that posits Kirk’s impressions of him would ascribe to the Great Man theory of history.  This is also an aspect of the episode that largely mischaracterizes Kirk, mainly because why would he be interested so much in 19^th century American history.  Spock’s projection at least makes sense for being the mythical figure who started Vulcan society, but Kirk here is just in love with Lincoln, only vaguely mentioning that it’s probably not the real Abraham Lincoln.  Kirk is written with an uncharacteristic lack of curiosity and more as a strategic general so Lincoln can compare him to Grant which again doesn’t feel right for the character.  Yes, he’s a leader and is intelligent but he’s not really a master strategist in terms of fighting a war.

 

The first moment in the episode where you realize something is going to go horribly wrong with the commentary is giving a scene between Lincoln and Uhura, largely because it’s another scene written from a white perspective.  Roddenberry and Heinemann, I’m not certain which but lean towards Roddenberry, have Lincoln refer to Uhura as a term that would be historically accurate but is a racial slur.  The slur is also gendered subtly contributing to the sexualization and exotification of women of color and black women in particular, which actually could have been interesting if it would be used to show Lincoln’s own biases but because this is a very white led show from 1969, the conclusion is essentially sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.  Watching the scene you can see Nichelle Nichols holding back emotions at having to claim the slur doesn’t affect her because slurs have no power in the future which is attempting to be optimistic about the future, but ignores the very real power of words in the present.  This is partially because Rodenberry and Heineman are white and are clearly not aware of the systemic natures of bigotry, see other Roddenberry penned episodes like “A Private Little War” and “The Omega Glory”.

 

Overall, “The Savage Curtain” is an episode without a discernable message that an already weak production from director Herschel Daugherty on some very small sets and action that is honestly poorly choreographed (and like many 1960s productions the guest cast is all white including a projection of Genghis Kahn and a very dark Klingon).  Gene Roddenberry proves once again how limited his progressive vision of the future is in writing an episode which is incredibly regressive while philosophically deciding that good and evil are the same actually.  Not since “The Omega Glory” has this episode been that bad and like “The Omega Glory” it’s one where there is a blinding patriotism informs the characterization all while the world around Star Trek had been crashing that patriotism down around it.  One of the worst.  1/10.