Emotional Chemsitry by: Simon A. Forward

 

Simon A. Forward loves Russian literature and Doctor Who.  I love Doctor Who and have not read nearly enough Russian literature to consider myself a massive fan.  Emotional Chemistry is a book that takes its chapter titles from famous works of Russian literature from Chekov to Turgenev.  The novel is split into three different time periods in the history of Russia: the past, the relatively near future, and the far future.  It is also a story about falling in love in ways that ultimately fall apart.  Forward is attempting a tragedy with a TARDIS team that is built upon tragedy.  Fitz Kreiner and the Doctor have both been through their own personal hells, arguably still going through them while newcomer Trix MacMillan has her own traumas to work through.  It’s a shame then that Simon A. Forward does not actually do much in terms of pushing these characters forward.  Emotional Chemistry is a novel that reads closer to a stopgap in between bigger plot points.  Timeless ended with Trix a new member of the TARDIS team and the team realizing that Sabbath has some mysterious bosses that have been behind apparently everything the Eighth Doctor Adventures have been building towards.  This is yet another novel where there is a clear disconnect with the author writing and the direction of the range, a problem that plagued much of the alternate universe sequence that led to this point.  There is a feeling of distinct lack of communication between the writers as the range is slowing down and reaching its eventual conclusion.

 

These things would not be a terrible problem; however Simon A. Forward is an author whose work seems to work better in short doses than in the form of a novel and even than that is hit or miss.  Emotional Chemistry has an incredibly slow start, juggling three plotlines while lacking a consistency in terms of pace.  Much of the first half of the novel would be considered a Doctor-lite story which again is not necessarily an issue, there have been novels such as Birthright that barely feature the doctor but his presence and influence is felt.  For Emotional Chemistry, Forward almost seems to have had a piece of original speculative fiction focused on Russian history and future time travel experiments, but it was retrofitted into the world of Doctor Who.  The big Doctor Who connection is the Zygma experiments featured in The Talons of Weng-Chiang, with several mentions of the character of Magnus Greel, but as this is written into a sequel it the references feel like a retrofitting. The supporting characters are largely military characters, partially working for OGRON, the Russian branch of UNIT, which is for whatever reason a reference to the Ogrons.  This and the Greel references make me wonder if it’s a tribute to the fact that some of the earlier VHS releases were The Talons of Weng-Chiang and Day of the Daleks.

 

These are the ideas with the most depth, the supporting characters feel all particularly like stock characters once the TARDIS team becomes important to the plot.  The most interesting side character is Aphrodite.  Aphrodite metatextually is representative of the relationships.  She’s an alien who is the result of her parents love in a society where having children were forbidden and much of her characterization is about being empathic and someone’s missing half.  While she is given the name of the Greek goddess of love, her story has its roots in Plato’s Symposium in a dialogue with Aristophanes about the third sex of a hermaphrodite, split in half by Zeus and searching for their other half to become whole again.  This is a perfectly fine myth and piece of philosophy to explore in a science fiction novel, but Emotional Chemistry never really achieves what it sets out to do because it eventually has to remember the Doctor, Fitz, and Trix are there.

 

Overall, Emotional Chemistry is actually a really good idea for an original piece of speculative fiction, but in pitching and writing it as a Doctor Who novel it feels pointless.  Simon A. Forward feels more at home writing the novel as a series of connected short stories instead of a continuing narrative, only really committing to that when it becomes more focused on the Doctor.  This leaves it lacking in a direction and with Forward’s basic prose it becomes a chore that only covers ground that’s been covered elsewhere in the range.  3/10.

Redemption Part I by: Ronald D. Moore and directed by: Cliff Bole

 

“Redemption, Part I” is written by: Ronald D. Moore and is directed by: Cliff Bole.  It was produced under production code 200, was the 26^th episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation Season 4, the 100^th episode overall, and was broadcast on June 17, 1991.

 

Were Star Trek: The Next Generation not initially broadcast in first-run syndication, “Redemption, Part I” is the point where the show reached the 100-episode threshold to enter syndication.  It’s possible that were this on regular television “Redemption” would have been the finale of the show.  Now because the past two seasons had been incredibly popular and there was already a guarantee of a fifth season, but “Redemption, Part I” was still written and produced without Ronald D. Moore knowing where the second part is going.  For my part, I also do not know where the second part is going, this is not a show that I am looking at in retrospect.  “Redemption, Part I” is an episode that structurally diverges from where the third season of Star Trek: The Next Generation ended.  “Redemption” ends with a cliffhanger, but it’s a cliffhanger that quite easily could have been cut and the episode would not have changed.  The emotional weight of the resolution has nothing to do with the cliffhanger, it’s an element that there is a future story coming in the opening of the fifth season.  “The Best of Both Worlds, Part I” ended with the point of highest tension of a single adventure, while “Redemption Part I” ends with a shakeup of the status quo.  Worf, having his honor restored, resigns his commission from Starfleet to assist his brother and Gowron in stopping a Klingon civil war that is brewing.  Michael Dorn gives a great emotional exit, easily to be read upon initial broadcast as a full exit from the show.  Obviously as this is a first part and season five opens with the continuation of the show, but the framing is easily read that Worf is gone and would be a future special guest star.  This is a season that already had the same thing happen to Wesley Crushser, played by Will Wheaton.

 

The actual cliffhanger for “Redemption, Part I” is one designed to fuel speculation.  It’s furthering a plot point from two episodes ago.  In “The Mind’s Eye”, Denise Crosby played a character in the shadows manipulating the Romulan plot.  In “Redemption, Part I” she returns, presumably playing the same character, manipulating the sisters of Duras, Lursa and B’Etor played by Barbara March and Gwynyth Walsh respectively, into causing a civil war.  The reveal is that Crosby is playing a Romulan that looks similar to Tasha Yar.  As a cliffhanger, it is actually the episode’s weakest element.  Now, this may be because the version of the episode available is a high definition restoration, however, Denise Crosby’s voice is at no point disguised through the episode and her name is present in the guest cast after the opening credits.  The reveal is shot quite well, it’s very evocative in terms of where it indicates the episode is going, but it does not actually add much to the story.  Before these final moments, there already was scenes with this character and the Klingons so the audience already knows that the plan is to take over the Klingon empire and provide some sort of revenge on the Enterprise.  It’s possible that the character’s status as a Romulan is meant to be a twist, but in context with “The Mind’s Eye” that twist is particularly odd.  Crosby plays the part well and it is obvious that the fifth season is going to open with explanations as to who exactly she is and what connection to Picard and the Enterprise, but it is a part that is just a further tease for the next season.

 

The actual plot of “Redemption, Part I” is installing Gowron as Chancellor of the Klingon High Council.  For a season finale, there is a great risk being taken by instead of filling it with action and spectacle as “The Best of Both Worlds, Part I”, it’s a very dialogue heavy episode around Klingon political discussions.  Ronald D. Moore actually puts a lot into crafting the Klingon politics as fully centered on their culture, issues and all.  There is an underlying misogyny to Klingon politics, women cannot serve on the council so Lursa and B’Etor have to use an illegitimate son of Duras Toral played by JD Cullum.  The sisters have to be working in the shadows and behind the scenes, and their actual plan is noted as being far too clever for the intricacies of Klingon society.  That society does not allow them direct access to power, however, their actions do contain the indirect power to put their society into extreme turmoil.  The best scene of the episode is Picard, for lack of a better word, confronting the pair diplomatically, knowing that he is in a no win situation.  He has been brought in as arbiter for Gowron’s claim to the high council, and everybody in the scene knows that no matter Picard’s decision, there is going to be turmoil be it Gowron being murdered in the night leading to a civil war, or Gowron not being instilled therefore leading to a civil war.  Picard also knows that because he is a Federation starship captain, whatever civil war follows, he will not be allowed to interfere.  The Klingon Empire is still a separate entity, it’s why Picard refuses Worf’s extended leave at the end of the episode.

 

With all of those elements, the episode belongs to Michael Dorn.  This is very possibly his best performance, Moore’s script reflecting Worf’s growth as a person coming to terms with his identity as a Klingon raised by humans.  There is a fantastic scene early in the episode where Worf is doing weapons training with Guinan, Whoopi Goldberg clearly having the time of her life playing the character as the mentor she is with the extreme knowledge and power.  Worf as a character had to have several steps on his journey of identity.  This episode is where he gets everything that he wants, Gowron restores his honor by the end of the episode, however, it comes to be hollow.  He is not excited to be going home at the beginning of the episode, because he knows there is going to be turmoil and he has obligations to others.  This is an episode where the emotional crux is that Worf has to make a stand with his people and brother, leaving the Enterprise behind.  Director Cliff Bole does a particularly good job of centering Worf in every scene that he is in even when he is not the focus of the scene.  This is also an episode that looks fantastic while still being within the boundaries of an episode of television.  The model work representing the Klingon home world is particularly great while the interior sets are shot so incredibly well, despite the small size of the sets.  These are very obviously sets on a television budget but they are also ones that work so well for the story that is being told.

 

Overall, “Redemption, Part I” is very different take on a season finale for Star Trek: The Next Generation.  It feels far more complete than “The Best of Both Worlds, Part I” and yet it also is clearly only the first half of the story.  In terms of performance, it is Michael Dorn’s best so far, plus bringing back Tony Todd is a particular treat.  There is some understated gender commentary that I do hope is picked up on in the resolution because it introduces a pair of fascinating female characters.  There is not an attempt to one-up the previous season’s finale, instead going for a character focused, political drama that works excellently even if it leads to a less than effective cliffhanger.  9/10.

Bottom 5 Episodes of Season 4:

5. The Nth Degree

4. Suddenly Human

3. The Loss

2. The Host

1. Galaxy's Child

Bottom 10 Episodes of Star Trek: The Next Generation So Far:

10. Too Short a Season

9. The Host

8. Galaxy's Child

7. Shades of Gray

6. Home Soil

5. Justice

4. Up the Long Ladder

3. Angel One

2. The Child

1. Code of Honor

Top 5 Episodes of Season 4:

5. Half a Life

4. First Contact

3. Family

2. The Best of Both Worlds, Part II

1. The Drumhead

To 10 Episodes of Star Trek: The Next Generation So Far:

10. Q Who

9. First Contact

8. Elementary Dear Data

7. The Offspring

6. Yesterday's Enterprise

5. Family

4. The Best of Both Worlds

3. The Drumhead

2. Sarek

1. The Measure of a Man

Timeless by: Stephen Cole

 

Stephen Cole is responsible for ending this grouping of Eighth Doctor Adventures surrounding the collapse of the multiverse and further plans of Sabbath.  Timeless is not a novel lacking in ideas or interesting imagery.  Cole brings the TARDIS team back to Earth and Trix MacMillan closer to the forefront, she even gets upgraded to proper companion status by the end of the book, with Anji Kapoor after multiple books foreshadowing that her time in the TARDIS is coming to an end finally gets to go back to her ordinary life.  There is something quite odd about this book being the first time a companion of South Asian descent leaves the TARDIS with a child in tow that they don’t necessarily want, but at least in this case the justification is there and Anji isn’t deprived of her agency in this story.  Timeless is a novel with some incredibly odd parallels to “The Reality War” and with Russell T. Davies use of the Wilderness Years ideas, I wouldn’t be surprised if the influence in the rewrites of that episode were intentional. This is because at the core of Timeless there is the destruction of Gallifrey that is hanging over the Doctor’s head as a failure, while the book’s stakes are the already collapsing multiverse.  The child, Chloe, is heavily implied to be a Time Lord along with Erasmus, both being stand ins for the Doctor and a companion.  Erasmus is missing a heart and Chloe still retains that sense of childlike wonder that fits a generic Doctor Who companion.  Between them they also have a dog, which feels like a comment on the extreme popularity of K9 in the public consciousness.  Cole is actually quite good at making Timeless work with the rather large stakes it is playing around with.

 

Where Timeless falls flat and never quite reaches its full potential is its pace, the first half of the novel is incredible.  It’s where most of the commentary is included and the mystery on exactly what Chloe and Erasmus are is fascinating.  Sabbath working with something that is seemingly bigger than himself, ultimately to be betrayed, is emblematic of where the back half of the novel falls apart.  Mainly because the conclusion plays too close into typical Doctor Who when Cole had been going so far into pushing the story away from Doctor Who.  There is a sense that the status quo has not been restored which keeps this as quite a good novel all things considered, but it is also so clearly meant to be the reset that was coming.  There is also a strong possibility that, as this novel was released a month before the revival of Doctor Who was commissioned and the BBC had already been making moves to bring the show back, the editorial staff were desperate to move things towards something more standard in case the book range was concluded unceremoniously.  In terms of publishing the release schedule had diminished to one novel a month after Time Zero and would remain that way until the end of both the Eighth Doctor Adventures and Past Doctor Adventures at the end of 2005, with a five-month break in the first half of 2005 to allow the revival to air.

 

Trix MacMillan as a character is quite fascinating.  Yes, she had a major part to play in the previous novel, The Last Resort, but under the pen of Stephen Cole she immediately becomes a fascinating pairing with Fitz.  As a pair, they are both larger than life, Trix throwing herself into the disguises and performing roles to save the multiverse with Fitz.  Anji as a part of the companion trio in Timeless finishes her run once again as the rational, serious companion who is set up to be more concerned with getting the job done than having a good time while saving the world.  Fitz and Trix clearly mask their inner lives while Anji has her serious influence on the Doctor.  The Doctor does begin the novel very much against Fitz’s weird scheme to make films remembering each universe they have been through, Fitz coming from the perspective of everybody deserving to be remembered.  Having the TARDIS team entirely in states of emotional distress in Timeless is what makes the first half of the novel work so well, everything is falling apart and while each character is on the same page in saving the multiverse.  There is this moment where the Doctor finally softens, seeing how rude he is being, and it might just be one of the best moments for the Eighth Doctor in this book range.

 

Overall, it’s the first half that makes Timeless worth reading, even if this is a book that Stephen Cole is using to hang on a wire.  The Eighth Doctor Adventures are entering their last leg with a brand new TARDIS team, but it’s telling a story that will be told again far worse in two decades time on television.  Sabbath, while characterized quite well, does become a bit too close to the Master in what Cole is doing and the restoration of the Earth is walking a very fine line between moving the story forward and retconning a lot of the ideas the Eighth Doctor Adventures have been playing with.  It is the ides present in the subtext about the universe lacking the Time Lords and the War both looming and already happening that makes the novel interesting to talk about when Cole wraps it up in standard Doctor Who.  6/10.

In Theory by: Joe Menosky and Ronald D. Moore and directed by: Patrick Stewart

 

“In Theory” is written by: Joe Menosky and Ronald D. Moore and is directed by: Patrick Stewart.  It was produced under production code 199, was the 25^th episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation Season 4, the 99^th episode overall, and was broadcast on June 3, 1991.

 

There’s a shot in “In Theory” where a female officer is partially merged through the floor of a hallway and that little bit of body horror is tonally just not nearly as effective as it should be.  This is an episode that is most notable for being the first episode directed by Patrick Stewart, making him the second cast member of Star Trek: The Next Generation to helm an episode.  Stewart shoots “In Theory” closer in tone to an episode of a sitcom which is apt, outside of that major piece of body horror that is snuck into the B-plot of the episode, as the A-plot is a stock sitcom plot.  The premise is that Data is once again experiencing an approximation of a human emotion and falling in love with a fellow crew member.  This time it is guest star Michele Scarabelli playing Jenna D’Sora, equally becoming attracted to Data’s blunt yet incredibly kind personality.  D’Sora has also just broken up with a boyfriend and asked Data to remind her exactly why she left him.  Yes, this is an episode where Data is framed as a rebound relationship throughout, ultimately leading to the relationship falling apart through no fault of his own.  The breakup scene at the end of the episode is quite good for playing a breakup as two responsible adults understanding that a relationship was started for the wrong reasons in a subversion of the typical sitcom framing that much of this plotline is playing into however unintentionally.  It’s a healthy understanding of relationships and while the ending is tinged to be bittersweet for Data, the episode does show him being quite willing to be an attentive partner and listen to what she is saying.

 

Modeling a healthy relationship while framing the episode with a sitcom plot does create disconnect tonally in how the episode is meant to play out.  Joe Menosky and Ronald D. Moore have both been responsible for quite good examples of character drama, however, “In Theory” has a script that is not really going for the dramatic while Stewart’s direction is shying away from the comedic.  There is a scenario where Data is being almost too attentive to D’Sora’s desires and needs.  Brent Spiner does get the chance to play Data as close to flirty as possible, dialing up the charm with the slight overenunciation of the dialogue.  The romantic farce of the episode that is meant to fuel the relationship is this overcorrection in being an attentive partner after Data making some initial missteps in the relationship.  These again are not framed as malicious or in the typical sitcom male archetype of being inattentive, just the usual explanation of Data not quite understanding typical acts of humanity.  Menosky and Moore clearly wish for the audience to find it funny, but it is framed just as Data being Data.  There is the issue that at this point a plot like “In Theory” has been done before with Data, though not necessarily better.  The relationship in this episode is almost written as a continuation between the relationship between Data and Tasha Yar from the first season of Star Trek: The Next Generation.  D’Sora is a guest character, however, she is styled quite similarly to how Yar was styled, Scarabelli is a tall, thin blond playing a crew member who has had difficulty in previous relationships.  That is the extent of her characterization, something that is becoming a recurring issue with single episode love interests, falling into some of the issues as the romantic interest in “The Host”.  That isn’t to say that the A-plot is bad, it is not, it’s just an incredibly standard plot that is going over ground that has been done with Data elsewhere, for better and worse.

 

The aspects of the A-plot that work quite well are whenever Data interacts with a recurring character, going to his friends and colleagues for advice into how to pursue the relationship.  The best interactions are with Worf, Michael Dorn picking up on the comedy of Worf’s protective response over D’Sora, and with Keiko and Miles O’Brien, that couple getting to be explicitly funny while Rosalind Chao and Colm Meany play their roles in love.  For the dramatic weight, Whoopi Goldberg as Guinan is given a guest spot providing more serious advice for Data, something that’s just become her role on the show at this point, but it’s a nice little scene.  The B-plot of the episode is tonally quite different from the A-plot, it is about a poltergeist of sorts on the Enterprise.  Objects, and Data’s cat, begin to phase through other objects on the ship because it is close to a specific nebula that is causing distortion in the space-time continuum.  This is an oddly specific science fiction plot to be used on a simple B-plot.  It’s material that could easily be elevated to an A-plot for Star Trek: The Next Generation, even centering Picard as the hero who needs to attempt a noble sacrifice to resolve the distortions.  There is the obvious hypothesis that because Patrick Stewart was slated to direct this slot, this idea was put into a B-plot simply because he needed to have a reduced screentime, but unlike the episode’s directed by Jonahtan Frakes, Picard does appear quite a bit even in the A-plot of “In Theory”.  It’s not a bad plotline, but again it makes some particularly odd decisions.

 

Overall, the prominence of “In Theory” really comes down to the fact that Patrick Stewart is in the director’s chair.  Outside of that it is a perfectly serviceable episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation, though when compared to previous episodes focused on Data it is significantly less interesting and with less to say from writers who are usually overflowing with interesting ideas.  The sitcom framing being contextualized in the dramatic world of Star Trek: The Next Generation is the biggest downside to the episode which could have been better.  Despite being a largely enjoyable time, this is going to become one of those episodes that gets lost in the shuffle.  6/10.

Uzumaki by: Junji Ito translated by: Yuji Oniki

 

“Spiral into horror” is the tagline printed on the cover of Junji Ito’s Uzumaki, a three-volume manga collected about the isolated town of Kurouzu-cho and its slow destruction.  Structurally, it’s an odd story to read.  The last third or so is an explicitly connected narrative, essentially one connected story after two thirds of the novel has been short horror stories set in Kurouzu-cho, usually ending with the subject of the horror dying in a way that is related to the shape of a spiral.  Ito’s use of the spiral throughout Uzumaki is to represent the existential horror of living in an uncaring society and universe.  Kurouzu-cho is an isolated town, far from the metropolitan centers of Japan, full of uncaring adults who will push away any sense of community and children who learn far too early to emulate their parents.  The ending of Uzumaki is nihilistic to the extreme, the protagonists lose and the town falls into the spiral at the center of the town.  Protagonists Kirie and Shuichi give up any chance of getting out and become formless parts of the spiral, the town folding in on itself before the narration indicates that this has happened before and will happen again.  It cannot be changed.  It cannot be stopped.  The spiral will return.  There is no hope.  Included in the back of the volume is a deleted chapter where the horror is explicitly cosmic, the spiral of the galaxy.  Uzumaki is nihilist in the extreme, life is full of pain and then you die, your entire world going with you.  The ending leaves the reader empty, ultimately the horror cannot be explained.  This is cosmic horror where the cosmic horror comes directly from the Earth and those around them.  The beginning of the story is a standard, if well written horror story of a family becoming obsessed with a spiral before it drives them to mutilation and suicide.  It’s psychological and creates a mission statement for Uzumaki while standing on its own as a complete story.

 

As is typical for manga, Ito is writing, drawing, and lettering Uzumaki, however the lettering is redone for the English edition with the translation coming from Yuji Oniki.  The translation does indicate the style is quite clipped, dialogue and narration is quite clipped.  There is this sense that the characters are being continually cut off, adding to the isolating effect of the horror.  Ito’s strongest suit is the art.  Uzumaki is a tale of body horror, the spiral becoming the symbol of twisting the human form into something inhuman.  There are two particular installments of the series that bring the body horror to its most gruesome.  First is “The Snail”, the tale of a boy who only comes to school when it rains, before not coming all together.  He gets slower, more hunched over, before transforming into a giant snail.  It’s one of the simpler pieces of horror, though becoming a snail seems to spread and eventually plays into becoming a food source when the town is completely falling apart.  Ito masters the use of the still image, the horror in the chapter coming from very specifically avoiding the sue of motion in the art.  This is particularly tricky to pull off, the best art in this type of storytelling relies on implied motion that is absent here.  Second is “The Umbilical Cord” which plays upon the fears of childbirth and the reduction of women into being incubators for children.  There is also a parasitic fungus that represents the spiral and the perversion of the children, taking certain visual cues from Village of the Damned and Rosemary’s Baby for inspiration.

 

Overall, Junji Ito’s horror is the horror in the pointlessness.  There is an underlying sense of isolation being what kills, the outsiders are subjected to the terror before the universe peels back what makes people exist.  Uzumaki excels at body horror because the story’s depth comes from simplicity.  The intention is to leave the reader with this pit of hopelessness as a warning for the cycles of terror that befall humanity.  And in that deep despair the reader has to reach inside themselves to find some sort of hope and that’s what makes it beautiful, but only as a complete picture.  9/10.

The Mind's Eye by: Rene Echevarria from a story by: Rene Echevarria and Ken Schafer and directed by: David Livingston

 

“The Mind’s Eye” is written by: René Echevarria, from a story by: Ken Schafer and René Echevarria, and is directed by: David Livingston.  It was produced under production code 198, was the 24^th episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation Season 4, the 98^th episode overall, and was broadcast on May 27, 1991.

 

The pop culture depiction of enemy agents brainwashing a hero to infiltrate and assassinate has its roots in The Manchurian Candidate, a book and film that Star Trek: The Next Generation directly plays homage to in “The Mind’s Eye”.  As an episode, “The Mind’s Eye” is quite good, it’s best scene is actually the final scene after the resolution where Geordi La Forge, his brainwashing broken, is receiving counseling from Deanna Troi, indicating that there is still lingering trauma.  He remembers his time on Risa, memories implanted by the Romulans attempting the assassination of Klingon governor Vagh.  It’s a tiny little character moment, but like The Best of Both Worlds and “Family” it’s one of those little moments that have been cropping up in Star Trek: The Next Generation since the previous season.  The smallness of the moment is enough in René Echevarria’s script to stick out as integral for making the episode work.  It also gives LeVar Burton a chance to really put his heart into the performance of loss and just how terrifying it is to be aware of a loss of control.  That loss of control of oneself has become a recurring idea in this season of the show, for better and worse.  Giving Marina Sirtis the small chance to play Troi as an actual counsellor is also a breath of fresh air, especially after the previous episode reducing the female characters to relationships with men.  It’s the only thing of note that Troi does in “The Mind’s Eye” and yet it feels like an important piece for her character.

 

Echevarira’s script for “The Mind’s Eye” is a fairly simple story, it is a Cold War style brainwashing thriller with Geordi as the victim.  The Manchurian Candidate is directly paralleled in the plot and in David Livingston’s direction.  Livingston lights the episode like a film, quite dramatically.  The brainwashing sequence is quite horrific for an episode of television broadcast in 1991, Livingston framing Geordi’s face in the center of the screen and adding a small amount of light to his eyes in such a way that emphasizes the trauma.  Geordi’s disability is being used against him, all shown through Livingston’s direction and that framing of the eyes.  Because Geordi’s visor is taken away, Burton is wearing the contacts that completely make his eyes sclera which have been used before, but here they become representation of him losing himself to the brainwashing.  Through the rest of the episode, the brainwashing is played as sinister as Geordi La Forge is depicted as going about his duties as per normal, with no indication of brainwashing outside of actions that the audience would recognize as sabotage.  Echevarria does spend much of the time on the B-plot of the episode with governor Cah and Klingon ambassador Kell.  It’s mostly a reflection on where Worf’s honor is and how Picard and the Enterprise are still upholding his position as security chief.

 

There is a reading of “The Mind’s Eye” as setup for future plotlines on the show.  Now when writing these reviews I actually do not know where the future of Star Trek: The Next Generation is going, this is the first time I have seen the show.  This is an episode that by placing so much emphasis on Worf’s honor feels like setting up either the season finale or a future event episode of the season.  The conclusion is that ambassador Kell, played by Larry Dobkin, is in fact in league with the Romulans in orchestrating the assassination attempt and that in Klingon society there are some secretly glad that Worf, despite losing his honor in the process, acted in the way that he did.  There is also the quite odd casting choice of Denise Crosby as a shadowy figure during the brainwashing.  This is one of those appearances that is clearly meant to fuel speculation as to what the Romulans are planning, the audience picking up that it is Crosby, but not quite clear on who she is playing.  There is not really an obvious choice for the role and Crosby in the short performance does not play it as Tasha Yar, and while I would like to speculate that it is an evil, mirror universe version of Tasha or something else, it is clearly a tease that only a television show could do.  Hopefully this is a tease that will pay off this season as it would be odd to build it up only two episodes before the finale for a plot point that could come at any point in the fifth season.

 

Overall, “The Mind’s Eye” is made memorable because of much of the style elevating the substance.  Directly writing a pastiche of a piece of pop culture is actually a good trick for television and David Livingston is a director whose style is incredibly cinematic.  This is an excellent tutorial in how to dramatically light an episode of television.  It’s quite a good episode even by being at its core a basic pastiche of The Manchurian Candidate.  7/10.

The Burn Line by: Jonathan Sims

 

The Burn Line is the third novel from Jonathan Sims.  Sims is a writer whose most well-known work is The Magnus Archives, a horror podcast that ran from 2016 to 2021, gaining a not insignificant online fandom.  It was a podcast that I discovered at the right time in my life for the horror to resonate quite well.  This is my first exposure to Sims’ prose work but the similarities in style cannot be denied.  While The Burn Line is a novel primarily in the third person there is a creeping dread, playing on the fear of the unknown.  Five strangers encounter each other on a subway line while the city of London is under a heatwave.  Something terrifying happens, however, none of them are able to recall exactly what they encountered, the gaps in their memories.  It is only when one of them suffers a loss of a friend that the group begins to be brought together and memory begins to trickle events back into place.  The first part of the novel, taking up approximately 80 pages is that initial event told from the perspective of our five characters.  Sims’ work in short fiction and podcasting is excellent at making each narrative voice distinct with particular emphasis on their background.  There is a sense of wrongness when each character steps into the train carriage, entering a world that none of them are meant to see and on the surface far more complex than what their everyday life would allow.

 

The burnout of the working class is central to The Burn Line.  Each of our protagonists are at some stage of burnout with different intensity and from a different source.  Each is attempting to cope with it somehow from Elise getting a new job, to Senyo taking the few moments to appreciate his wife.  It’s the drudgery of day-to-day life, exacerbated by living in a post-COVID lockdown world.  Sims noting Elise wearing a mask keeps the pandemic in the forefront of the reader, existing in a changed world where young adults have lived through once in a lifetime historical event after once in a lifetime historical event.  Four of the five are holding onto their lives in a way the typical reader will understand, living life day to day with some semblance of security.  Aaron, the most compelling of the protagonists and the first to realize that there is something supernatural preying on people, is where most readers would recognize rock bottom.  He is homeless; however, Sims recognizes that homeless people are people, treating his narrative as human as the others.  He does not perceive himself as being at rock bottom, there is an awareness in the narrative of how easy it is for someone to lose their home.  Each of the other protagonists are equally far away from becoming homeless, working paycheck to paycheck.  It is their class solidarity that makes them aware of the evil lurking under the streets of London, and the narrative is one that punishes those who break that solidarity.  Aaron’s treatment by the narrative is quite kind, he is not singled out for prejudice.  Each protagonist has some aspect of themselves that the others have underlying biases.

 

The structure of the characters do match quite easily into classic fantasy tropes of the five man band.  Aaron representing the heart, Elise and Tash the brains and the brawn, Will the lancer, and Senyo the leader, though with the way that Sims plots The Burn Line in line with mid-century science fiction and horror this may be accidental and a simple nature of tropes becoming universal.  It is a structure that does work quite well for The Burn Line even if an understanding of the trope can give you for where the plot is going.  Structurally, the novel is also split into five parts and the twist at the midpoint is predictable.  The type of horror that Sims is working with shifts from a cosmic horror to all too real horrors of monsters, those monsters representing the upper class quite obviously.  Sims is not a writer who works in subtlety when it comes to the major themes and motifs of his work, and that does act as a double-edged sword.  It is the characters where the subtleties lie and where readers will find their most enjoyment.  Sims’ prose is also clearly meant to be read aloud instead of in a book, again a holdover from his experience as the writer of The Magnus Archives.  This is particularly great for maintaining the atmosphere when the switch in approach occurs.

 

Overall, The Burn Line is a quite good little horror novel.  Thematically it is covering material that stretches to the beginnings of the genre but only in a way that works through a post-COVID lens.  Jonathan Sims centers human kindness as what is going to be responsible for saving us all and while that is a little cheesy in places it does help sustain and draw the horror.  7/10.