Rage is the one novel by Stephen King,
writing for the first time under the pseudonym Richard Bachman, pulled from publication
at King’s request. This is because it
was named by several school shootings directly named as an inspiration, Stephen
King having more of a backbone with his power than most politicians and
conservative commentators. Now I read it
in The Bachman Books, a copy of which published in the mid-1980s I found
in my library. This review isn’t going
to be a question of whether or not Rage should have been pulled from publication,
there isn’t really an argument to be made that it should be published anymore
because it was pulled entirely by King’s volition. There was no public pressure to pull it and
King has repeatedly stated and implied that he is happy it is no longer in
print. As with any other creative work,
if the creator wishes to pull that work there is nothing we can do.
Rage, however, is an interesting case
of a novella. It is one of the earliest
works by Stephen King, published in 1977 but written several years earlier
beginning when King was in high school under the title Getting It On. After the publication of Carrie and ‘Salem’s
Lot, while The Shining was being prepared for publication, King edited
and submitted Rage for publication but the general practice was that
authors would only publish one book a year so King invented Richard Bachman especially
for this publication (and to see if he could sell a book without his name
recognition since both Carrie and ‘Salem’s Lot were optioned for
adaptations). There’s almost a point
where the controversy surrounding Rage is more interesting than the
novella itself. Like all the works of
Stephen King, it’s quite easy to read stylistically. The chapters are short and in a first person
limited perspective from a high school student as he is expelled, snaps
mentally, grabs the gun that he keeps in his locker, shoots a math teacher
dead, and holds his class hostage. The
plot is fairly thin, even for the 150 pages, the class eventually succumbing to
Stockholm syndrome, one student in particularly being sympathetic to main
character Charlie Decker, both ending up in psychiatric care by the end of the
novella. The reason it reads quickly is
because it is short and King’s style is simple, but in that simplicity there is
a lack of depth here.
Perhaps
there is some psychosexual read to Rage and Charlie Decker. He doesn’t know why he does what he does, the
flashbacks indicating it is largely from the physical abuse his father that has
at the very least developed the violent tendencies. There’s a lot of talk about sex and sexual
frustration in Rage, the original title Getting It On being a
particular sexual euphemism. Charlie
Decker asks adults about their sexual relationships with their wives, often
uses sexual insults in his own rants, and is generally portrayed as sexually
ignorant. The line ‘getting it on’
repeats quite often and there’s a potential reading that the violence performed
is just the sexual act of getting it on.
The trouble is of course, King is writing this as a teenager without the
maturity to really unpack any of the ideas he thinks he is using. It’s very possible that what is present
thematically are things King added during the rewriting of the novella for
initial publication, and even then they don’t ever coalesce into anything meaningful.
Overall, Rage
is certainly a fitting title. It’s a
novella that is really just one burst of rage and than an aftermath that doesn’t
quite know what it wants to say about teenage angst. King is clearly inspired by The Catcher in
the Rye and even though I am not the world’s biggest Salinger fan, King
seems to have taken away even less from Salinger than I have. This is just a barely mediocre novella from a
writer who had an inciting incident without knowing where to go with it. 4/10.

No comments:
Post a Comment