Dracula is perhaps the
one classic novel I find myself coming back to the most. It’s a tale representing several things that
has resonated through the years, skyrocketing vampires to popularity as well as
having several interesting and valid readings.
British journalist Kim Newman is one such person who has his own
readings of Dracula as well as dedicating much of his work to horror
fiction and film history, the 1931 Bela Lugosi led Dracula being responsible
for his love of horror. In the mid-1980s,
he and Neil Gaiman came up with an idea for what if Dracula won and what an
alternate history telling of Dracula may be like, something they might
work on together. Ultimately that never
came to be, but in 1992, Newman published Anno Dracula, playing on the same
idea. The book is set in 1888 where
Dracula has killed Abraham Van Helsing, Jonathan Harker, and Quincy Morris,
fully converted Mina Harker into a vampire, and found himself marrying Queen
Victoria. Vampirism has now essentially
become a status symbol of the upper class with the lower classes essentially becoming
food for the upper classes, Newman pulling a class narrative throughout the
book but through the eyes of the upper class for the majority. Those who are rich who don’t turn such as
Charles Beauregard and Penelope Churchward are pressured into doing so, and
those who are turned from lower classes are generally prejudiced against. The main event of the novel is the
investigations surrounding the Jack the Ripper murders, still prostitutes, but
all done with silver knives as silver kills vampires.
As this is a sequel to Dracula and thus already
set in a fictional universe, Anno Dracula also blends history with
several pieces of Victorian and post-Victorian fiction. This is a universe where Sherlock Holmes
exists as well as several other fictional vampires, both in and outside of the
public domain (Barnabas Collins from the 1960s soap opera Dark Shadows
makes a cameo). Adam Adamant from the
cult 1960s Adam Adamant Lives is name dropped, showing just how obscure Newman
would go. I am certain there are references
that I am not catching, and Newman is skilled enough to not make the references
feel distracting to the narrative. This
is at least for the most part as the original characters don’t always feel as
if they have their own authorial voices.
The narrative is an exploration of society, not a murder mystery, as it’s
quite obvious who Jack the Ripper is going to turn out to be from the very
first page. Newman is interesting as you
don’t entirely want the Ripper to be caught, the vampires while acting as if
they have made society better have only brought much of the seediness of
Victorian times to the forefront while still keeping the British stiff upper
lips. People deciding to become vampires
willingly is an interesting idea for a book which Newman explores throughout Anno
Dracula, with Dracula himself being a background figure who has wormed his
way to the heart of Britain, but as with much of the monarchy finds himself not
actively participating in the plot. This
makes it interesting as several other vampires are explored, both fictional and
historical figures who have given themselves over.
It’s also a book that moves along at a really nice
pace, with Newman switching points of view from vampires to still living humans
who want to be vampires to those who despise the vampires. Beauregard in particular is interesting as he
has come to terms with what life is while his fiancé Penelope wishes to
maintain their status as the upper class by becoming vampires. Beauregard works for the Diogenes Club from
Conan Doyle’s The Adventure of the Greek Interpreter and is one of many
investigating the murders which call into question London’s lifestyle, much
like the historical Jack the Ripper case would inevitably do. He is a fascinating main character as he
interacts with vampires and humans both of whom he has formed deep, impactful
relationships with as vampires especially are both inhuman and human monsters
who find themselves in society. Penelope
as a socialite is also guarded by Victorian England’s views on women which
Newman also explores, vampires integrating themselves into society not immediately
causing a level playing field for women.
There are still societal revolutions to come for progress and adding
vampires in the mix may have even slowed down that progress with humanity
slowly becoming a minority in London and indeed the rest of the world.
Overall, Anno Dracula is a fascinating idea for
an alternative history tale adding in the fantastic and horrific together for
what’s a bloody good time. It isn’t perfect
and has an issue of Newman’s own voice not quite matching that of the
characters he takes from other stories, at least for the non-historical
characters. It also doesn’t quite work
as marketed as a mystery, but is something that shines in the ideas that it
plays around with throughout the book.
8/10.
No comments:
Post a Comment