Dune is a novel who’s
influence can be felt in nearly every piece of science fiction written after
its initial publishing date of 1965. Frank
Herbert’s book combines two previously published serials, rewritten and reedited
into book form: Dune World and The Prophet of Dune, and published
by the publisher of manuals for automobiles.
It’s a book with an odd origin from an author who is equally as
odd. Herbert lived his early life in poverty
and became inspired by sand dunes in Oregon to create Dune, imbuing it
and his other writings with his political and personal philosophy against the
selfishness of the human race, taking up causes, rightfully, against the United
States government during the second Red Scare and the Vietnam War. He was clearly a man appalled by the way he
saw the world turning, and put that in his writing, writing which would
resonate with the world. Dune as
a work is both incredibly simple and incredibly complex: the story is mostly a
standard tale of a royal house being overthrown and retaliating after a period
of time to plan and recover themselves, building an army. It’s almost deceptively simple, but it’s a long
novel as Herbert puts into every word, every scene takes on some sort of double
meaning. Books could be written on what
Herbert does in this book and without a doubt they most likely exist or will
exist. The experience of reading Dune
alone can put it in a class of its own, even if the engagement is one complex.
The first scene of the novel involves the young Paul
Atredies being tested by a Reverend Mother of the Bene Gesserit sisterhood. This test is where one of the book’s most
famous and important lines appears: “I must not fear. Fear is the mind killer. Fear is the little death that brings total
obliteration”. These three simple sentences
introduce a major importance for Herbert, the idea of action and overcoming the
fear of action and change being what humanity is all about. Herbert is cynical, making the distinction
between people and humans. While perhaps
pithy, to describe the view of people would involve the sneering idea of sheep
being led through their lives as the victims of other people, while humans are
the ones who dare to act and rise above.
This premise is flawed, as Herbert simplifies the argument to people only
having one-dimension which doesn’t actually apply. It doesn’t attempt to look at the societal
problems which create the kind of fear that Herbert implies is the little death,
just acting as if people cannot live for themselves. It’s so he can set up the messianic nature of
Paul for the Fremen later on which is something where while personal feelings may
find distaste, the cynicism still finds a way to resonate through the plot in
tandem with some optimism that the great evil still can be overthrown. Now, the messianic nature of Paul may be
Herbert’s attempt to justify the nature of just one man being able to change
the world which would be a hopeful message, though it isn’t the actions of just
one man. Paul is not the one who saves
the day, it’s his entire family working together even without contact or
communication once the house falls that end up bringing the positive outcome.
Herbert also doesn’t allow his cynicism to cloud ideas
of love. There are two principal couples
in the book, first Duke Leto and Lady Jessica (Paul’s parents), and eventually
Paul and Chani. The traitor to House
Atredies, Dr. Yueh, is only motivated by love and ensures that those in love
can actually survive, even if it is something that he will not make it out of
alive. Leto and Jessica are one of the
few couples in science fiction who are happy together, even if marriage was always
impossible. Lady Jessica at every turn is
motivated by the love for Leto and then the love of her son, Paul, above even
the orders of the sisterhood which have one goal of manipulating and creating
prophecy throughout the universe. While Leto
is a minor character throughout, Lady Jessica is a fascinating study in the love
of a wife and mother and is a morally complex character. She is manipulative, but never abusive. She goes through several points where she is the
one making mistakes and eventually has to acknowledge them and rise above
them. Her character arc hits its high
point at the end of the second part of the novel, where she takes on more responsibilities,
becoming a Reverend Mother. She is the
one who has to take quite a bit of time to actually figure things out.
The idea of inspiration of good people to cause others
to do good is also present in the book.
As mentioned previously, Dr. Yueh is a traitor, but only motivated by a
desire to see good happen even if the ends have to justify the means. The character of Liet Kynes is introduced as a
man who scoffs at authority, but almost immediately respects Duke Leto and has
second guesses of his part in the conspiracy to take down House Atredies while
the villains essentially rule through fear.
House Harkonnen is represented by the Baron Vladimir Harkonnen, who is
perhaps the one aspect of the book which has not aged. The Baron is a pedophile and homosexual,
perpetuating that stereotype, though you’re never actually given any scenes of sexual
acts. There’s also the incest element and
cruelty which makes him as a villain fascinating, but not easy to actually read
about. The cutting to him really only
works after the first part when he is used to advance some of the plots of the
minor and supporting characters. There
is also some amazing worldbuilding and Herbert’s prose is excellent, however,
the confusion of the philosophy and plot is where Dune really makes me
think. It’s a book which will stay with
the reader for a long time after you finish.
It’s a read which feels both complimentary and contradictory, and ends
with several questions about just what was being accomplished while that
accomplishment remains satisfactory.
10/10.
Well it's deeper than Dr. Who and has university classes using it to discuss religion, philosophy, morals history & politics. It's only confusing for those who living already concocted stereotyped views of the world so that they reduce the implications to say humans are just hopeless victims(CYNICALLY WORSE and promoted by people in power&privilege) when if you read the whole six books the main points Herbert instills is each of us can make choices and face our fears. That those who become or are victims ended up succumbing to the false fake fears the environment and perpetrators inflict upon them.
ReplyDeleteThe key issue is having the knowledge and experience to see above those institutional and self imposed fears to see the objective reality and where you have control. That's what full continuing education and proper real information is needed and is constantly obscured, removed or twisted (by those in power)to keep the individual person from making clear CHOICES without fear. These ideas in DUNE & the full series, if properly interpreted and understood than pithily reviewed about as 'CYNICAL' can help many people AND HAS if you interview deep fans of the books, many who are very accomplished from truly understanding TO FACE THEIR FEARS than reduce it to 'Wahh I'm a victim and have no power ever how I respond to fear' as you seem to think or has been taught to you as fact & real thus cynically able to avoid your passive culpability by saying it's all outside of your or other's control to make a positive change for yourself or help others.
Changing the predatory harmful environment(govt nations institutions society etc) doesn't negate the prey(individuals participants) overcoming their fear and thus to survive by consciously controlling their reactions thoughts and behaviors which is Herbert's point.
First, don't knock the depth of Doctor Who, you'd be surprised stuff you could do. See I don't think I'm wrong in saying Herbert is incredibly cynical, half of the book is a comment on the Vietnam War and the disregard for the environment. Also you do realize I enjoyed Dune, I enjoyed it a lot, even if I find Herbert's idea of human above people to be wrong.
DeleteI do in fact follow Dune fans, it was one of the reasons I finally got around to reading it (that and the film that's coming out in October). I'd also argue that Herbert doesn't actually give anything to face fears except the modern ideal of stoicism which is a bit toxic, though that is more of a surface reading of that line because the theme of not being dominated by fear is important. You also seem to be under a misapprehension that this review is somehow comprehensive, it isn't. I've only read Dune once and this was also a lot of me trying to parse out my thoughts because my criticisms aren't with the quality but some of Herbert's conclusions.