Sunday, March 2, 2025

The Crooked World by: Steve Lyons

 

In Act 2 of Stephen Sondheim and James Lapine’s Into the Woods, as the narrator is discussing the problem of the giant, the fairy tale characters break out of the story, drag the narrator in, and sacrifice him to the giant.  This breaks the narrative and means the characters must now actually choose what actions to take without the guiding hand of the author, they are now in control of the narrative and that leads to more death and tragedy before eventually resolving in a hopeful enough ending, though always changing and trying to be better.  It is an essential piece of metatext that is both accessible and easy to understand.  It is important to bring this up because Doctor Who novelist Steve Lyons owns quite a lot to Into the Woods for his trilogy of metafictional novels Conundrum, Head Games, and The Crooked World, the latter being the most explicitly metatextual on speculative fiction in general and the very nature of Doctor Who as an idea.  Conundrum and Head Games are a pair of directly linked New Adventures set in the Land of Fiction, while The Crooked World is a spiritual successor to the other two in a similarly fictionally linked setting though one revealed to be a physical place and single planet.  The idea behind The Crooked World is that the Doctor is a force of nature responsible for changing the narrative flow of stories.  He comes in and fundamentally changes the rules of the universe every time he leaves the TARDIS.


The Crooked World uses this through the lens of cartoons, specifically cartoons pre-1970 including expies of the characters of Looney Tunes, Tom and Jerry, and Scooby-Doo, Where Are You?, deconstructing in the first 100 pages or so what makes each of these cartoons work and the formula they have to follow before ripping it to shreds.  The inciting incident is our Elmer Fudd/Porky Pig/Wile E. Coyote expy, Streaky Bacon shooting the Doctor with his blunderbuss which nearly kills him.  The Doctor, Fitz, and Anji do not work by cartoon logic, while the rest of the world does.  Lyons specifically draws on Robert Zemeckis’ Who Framed Roger Rabbit?, though not visually as this is a novel and there is no way to translate that technical wonder that film is, but the ideas are there.  The Crooked World as a planet is bound by cartoon morality: those shot will have an overreaction, fall over, maybe be carted off in an ambulance, but be back to normal almost immediately.  The Doctor brings injury, pain, and death in his wake to Looney Toons characters, Fitz brings meaningful relationships (through ironically the introduction of sex) to serial parodies, and Anji brings a sense of cold hard logic to the Scooby-Doo gang.  The world begins to almost immediately unravel and descend to chaos, every action the Doctor, Fitz, and Anji take ends up changing the world intrinsically and makes things worse.  Every thought they have ends up bringing the notions of war, corruption, capitalism, and death in their wake.

 

The novel eventually becomes a meditation on bringing the central idea of adult, fully formed morality, onto these cartoon characters.  What exactly are their purposes when there are consequences to their actions and the universe doesn’t essentially reset at the end of an episode?  Our Tom the Cat expy is put on trial at one point because he has genuinely attempted to kill the expy of Jerry the Mouse, and there is even at least some attempt to at least acknowledge much of the racial stereotyping of certain old cartoons.  Now this is where Lyons perhaps cannot go as far as he wishes to, the BBC was never going to get the rights to use any of the established characters, but it is clear exactly who they are so the commentary still works and is added to with the idea that these cartoon characters are already corruptions in who they are.  The big twist of the novel is that the Crooked World being this cartoon logic laden place is because of the mind of a dead child, taken and insulated at the center of the world who’s escape pod dying.  The Crooked World actually goes as far as it can go in making it explicit that changing the narrative as the Doctor and company are the ones to do is not an inherently good thing to happen.  The situation only gets worse and the Doctor, Fitz, and Anji do their best, but there’s a moment where they accidentally create an atomic bomb because they are thinking about it.  Lyons keeps reality pliable and even when the main trio try to make the world bend to their advantage, the influence of their morality eventually gives the inhabitants their own free will to override things.  It means that The Crooked World ends as a tragedy; like Into the Woods the Doctor, Fitz, and Anji are the ones to leave and the world just has to get on and make its own decisions.

 

Overall, The Crooked World is Steve Lyons’ masterpiece, it’s the crowning achievement of metatext, knowing exactly what cues to take.  One minute it has you laughing at the cartoon antics, and how weird things are going, the next it has you questioning exactly how long it will take for the idea to get old, and then finally it begins to have the shift of redirecting, and eventually losing the narrative.  10/10.

Saturday, March 1, 2025

Too Short a Season by: Michael Michaelian and D.C. Fontana, from a story by: Michael Michaelian, and directed by: Rob Bowman

 


“Too Short a Season” is written by: Michael Michaelian & D.C. Fontana, from a story by: Michael Michaelian, and is directed by: Rob Bowman.  It was produced under production code 112, was the 16th episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation, and was broadcast on February 8, 1988.

 

Star Trek struggles whenever it decides to discuss the subject of aging.  The original series firmly put aging in the category of something to be feared and reviled: getting old means getting infirm and possibly disabled, something that textually is presented as one of the worst things that will happen to people.  “The Deadly Years” is perhaps the prime example of this, an incredibly weak episode where the crew aging is the threat of the episode because they cannot operate the ship.  Star Trek: The Next Generation’s first season has generally been struggling with setting itself apart from the original series tonally and in terms of the types of stories being told.  There are multiple original series writers that get story and writing credits throughout the season and the third episode is a complete remake of an original series episode.  “Too Short a Season” is an episode that looks at “The Deadly Years” and writers Michael Michaelian and original series writer D.C. Fontana decide to do that story in reverse.  Instead of characters being aged up for horror, a single, supposedly brilliant negotiator, has taken a drug that is de-ageing him rapidly as he wants to be at his best to deal with a hostage negotiation.  That is the entire episode.  No, I’m not kidding.  This episode spends its time establishing Admiral Jameson and his wife, their relationship, the fact that he is a negotiator, the fact that he is being forcibly de-aged, and the twist that Karnas and his people aren’t being held hostage by terrorists but Karnas has been a terrorist this entire time and holding his own people hostage.  That last fact sounds like it would be a great twist if it actually worked, we don’t actually see any of the hostages, and it turns out that Jameson is actually a very bad negotiator but a very good capitulator.

 

“Too Short a Season” seems to want to be about how with age comes wisdom, and you shouldn’t want to fall back onto your youth because Jameson as a character gave Karnas weapons and the Federation never found out because the plot needs the Federation to have not found out how bad Jameson was at his job.  In writing, D.C. Fontana apparently greatly simplified Michael Michaelian’s original draft from actually having two sides of terrorists and decides to have Jameson die at the conclusion instead of being de-aged to 14 years old which is a money saving effort of having to cast another person (and a child to boot) while not remembering his wife.  That original ending would have actually made the age coming with wisdom actually working, there isn’t actually anything in the episode that young Jameson says that old Jameson couldn’t do.  The idea is that because he capitulated to Karnas as a young man he was actually unwise, but Jameson doesn’t actually do anything to convince Karnas to release the hostages.  Jameson just shows up as young, isn’t believed to be Jameson by Karnas, and then dies; the drug kills him and Karnas decides to let the hostages go.  It makes you ask, what was the point, and I’m not sure if either Michaelian or Fontana even know.  This would be the last script on Star Trek: The Next Generation that D.C. Fontana was credited with writing, and considering the behind the scenes troubles on the show in general she was likely quitting shortly after this episode was written.  It doesn’t help things that the actual main cast of the show aren’t actually given much to do, the closest are Picard and Crusher: the former has clashes with Jameson over his authority on the Enterprise because he’s a negotiator while the latter is essentially an exposition machine though both Patrick Stewart and Gates McFadden are trying.  The same cannot be said for Clayton Rohner as Jameson.  Yes, he is acting under several prosthetics throughout the episode as he de-ages, but Rohner’s performance is incredibly stilted.  It feels as if Rohner wants to doo the weak and wheezy stereotypical old man voice that everyone has, but doesn’t actually commit, nor does he seem to understand how to move under all the makeup.  Then you see him as the younger Jameson and he still moves weirdly and struggles with putting emphasis on the proper syllable, while doing an American accent that sounds fake but isn’t (Rohner is an American).

 

Overall, “Too Short a Season” is an episode that honestly doesn’t seem to care about really trying to say anything.  It may have its roots in being a course correction from 1960s episodes like “The Deadly Years”, if only metatextually, but the script doesn’t actually make any sort of sense in terms of telling a story.  The resolution just kind of happens, the central character could have maybe worked (or at least worked better) if the performance was at least decent.  A friend mused it’s “The Deadly Years” in reverse, and that’s honestly the best assessment I could give of it.  3/10.