How does one really
discuss a novel like The Stand? Do you try to summarize the hefty plot or go
into depth on the characters and themes employed by Stephen King in what could
easily be considered his magnum opus (until The Dark Tower)? Do you attempt to build a case on the basis
of the deep mythology King creates? Any
of these methods would be valid and this review is going to be sort of a mashup
of all the possible ways of discussing The Stand. Stephen King has published two versions of
the novel, the first in 1978 which ran 823 pages in hardcover, a hefty tome to
be sure, but the second version is the one this review looks at. The Stand: Complete and Uncut Edition
was published in 1990 after King had reinstated nearly 400 pages now running in
paperback at 1,439 pages. Unlike other
tomes by King, The Stand defies any real restriction on genre. Most classify the novel as a horror novel,
but it equally qualifies as political thriller, dark fantasy, a dystopia, and theology. Above all else, The Stand perhaps
should be described as a quest for meaning in an uncaring world and standing
for something. While King meant The Dark
Tower to be his version of The Lord of the Rings yet that title
really should go to The Stand.
Like The Lord of the Rings, The Stand is one story told in
three books (yet only ever published in one volume). The first book is about characters being
uprooted from their normal lives and are forced to head to an elderly authority
figure while a sinister figure begins raising an army like The Fellowship of
the Ring, the second book is about preparing and dealing with corruption
while finding a position to fight back in like The Two Towers, and the
third book is about the final confrontation and defeat of the great evil like The
Return of the King. This is by no
means a criticism against King, as the structure of the novel reads more like
an homage than a rip-off of Tolkein’s style and story.
The novel opens with 400
pages detailing the fall of society and the scattered survivors attempting to
find others who are still alive. The premise
of The Stand is that the United States Government had been secretly
working on a strain of influenza known as Project Blue or Captain Tripps with a
99.4% rate of effectiveness at infecting and killing, which due to bureaucracy and
human negligence, escapes and of course kills most of the population of the
Earth. The sequence of events in this section
of the novel flash across the United States of America as King chronicles what
normal citizens are doing as the epidemic hits, how exactly it hits, and how
they react as the world falls apart.
This is perhaps the most formulaic portion of the novel, going from
scene to scene, introducing a character, giving the reader a glimpse into their
lives to sympathize with their struggles and enjoy their triumphs, have either
them or someone close to them get the superflu, and slowly chronicle their
death. King does intercut these stories
with each other which allows much of the formulaic nature of this section of
the novel to be spiced with different stories being told. King also does an excellent job of introducing
a mix of important characters, unimportant characters, main characters, supporting
characters, and minor characters with each of them having some time in the forefront. There is a sense that any of the characters
introduced in this part could have become important characters had they been
lucky in surviving the plague. This is
also the section of the novel which is the most down to Earth, following human
characters dealing with very human conflicts.
If there was to be a singular protagonist who is the main character
throughout the novel, from beginning to end, it would be Stu Redman, introduced
early on as patient zero of the superflu drives and dies in his town, yet
throughout this section of the novel Stu is either a background character or
under the jurisdiction of the United States Government for his immunity to the superflu. The more interesting characters are Larry
Underwood and Frannie Goldsmith. Larry
is a singer who is down on his luck and has to move back in with his mother at
the beginning of his mother and throughout the novel his arc involves coming to
term with being given power and having to learn to lead. He has to find a purpose and is introduced as
a character who doesn’t know exactly what he’s doing with his life and his
story ends making a final stand for justice and freedom. The middle of the novel isn’t kind to Larry
as he doesn’t get as much to do while things move on, but King still manages to
make him an interesting character.
Frannie Goldsmith is perhaps less interesting as much of her role is to
be the standard love interest for Stu past the first third of the novel. Her backstory is interesting, with King going
a long way to destigmatize a woman becoming pregnant out of wedlock and deciding
to have the child. Her conflict with her
abusive and controlling mother ends when her mother dies from the superflu with
her father and she has to perform a burial.
For much of the middle of
the novel she acts as the narrator as the plot shifts from post-apocalyptic
horror to a political telling of the rebuilding of some sort of society from
the survivors. Frannie acts as secretary
and member of the committee in charge of running a community in Boulder, Colorado
along with the other protagonists for the novel. The community is run initially by Mother
Abigail Freemantle, an elderly woman who represents the side of good and God in
King’s allegory of good vs. evil. Mother
Abigail is one of King’s most memorable characters, who doesn’t actually appear
in any of his other books. She exhibits
telepathic powers and points of real magic as she can heal the sick, which she
believes are provided by God. She implants
dreams in survivors to attract them to her, and while in any other story this
would be the set up for a twist where it is revealed Abigail is the
villain. King subverts expectations and
makes Mother Abigail a kindly old woman with no ulterior motives except
genuinely wanting to see society rebuilt.
Once her community is set up, she goes out to find herself, only
returning to save the day before a tragic end of second act death. The middle of the novel is also where we
really get to see the novel’s main villain, Randall Flagg, who is essentially an
evil wizard. Flagg is a character who
delights in his evil deeds, creating his own community full of thugs and run as
a fascist regime in Las Vegas, Nevada. There
is delightful glee taken in the way which King writes for Flagg as a character,
as he tempts people over to his authoritarian regime through promises of riches
and magic. King contrasts the glee with downright
dark and upsetting imagery of crucifixion, whippings, and other gruesome executions.
Flagg’s villainy builds
up to the final part of the novel where King brings everything to a head and
ends on both an uplifting and deeply troubling note. King added a second ending to this novel in
the 1990 expansion which adds the troubling note retheming the book to once of
the cyclic nature of the battle between good and evil. There is something almost misanthropic in
this epilogue which is only about two pages long, and something that might just
reflect King’s outlook at the time of publishing. The third part of the novel is really where
Stuart Redman gets to be the main character.
When Mother Abigail leaves, Stuart is the character we follow the most
as people rally around him. Stu is not a
character who is completely well spoken, but he is still a symbol of hope for
the community of Boulder, even when Flagg influences a member of the community
to blow up a hospital killing seven members of the community. Stu is also not the typical hero (it’s Flagg’s
own hubris which brings him down), being a leader who doesn’t even make it to
the final confrontation with the villain.
Stu’s story is one of becoming a leader and returning triumphant as a
bringer of hope, months after going to confront Flagg and being disabled with a
broken leg. The real hero may be the mentally
handicapped Tom Cullen whose condition seems to make him believe everything is
spelled MOON, who is sent to spy on Flagg and is an emotional center for the
later half of the novel. Or perhaps deaf
and mute Nick Andros is the true hero of The Stand who is killed near
the end in an explosion and whose spirit allows Tom to save Stu’s life. Or maybe it’s Glen Bateman who shows defiance
against Flagg up to his final moments. The
Stand is a book where the hero figure isn’t really that clear and that is
one of its greatest aspects. All of the
human characters show the strengths of humanity and all of its villains show
its weaknesses, from pride, to lust, to sadism, King writes a story that weaves
in and out of humanity and explores what that means. This isn’t a novel that should be read
quickly, with time taken to enjoy everything, and as far as I’m concerned it is
one of King’s best 10/10.