The Loss by: Hilary J. Bader, Allan J. Adler, and Vanessa Greene, from a story by: Hilary J. Bader, and directed by: Chip Chalmers

 

“The Loss” is written by: Hilary J. Bader, Alan J. Adler, and Vanessa Greene, from a story by: Hilary J. Bader, and is directed by: Chip Chalmers.  It was produced under production code 184, was the 10^th episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation Season 4, the 84^th episode overall, and was broadcast on December 31, 1990.

 

“The Loss” is a complicated and deeply problematic episode.  Structurally it fits right in with the character focused brief of a Star Trek: The Next Generation episode.  The idea at the core of “The Loss” is examining the reality that anybody could become disabled, permanently or temporarily.  This is represented in the episode by Deanna Troi losing her empathic abilities due to the Enterprise encountering an energy phenomenon.  The crew understanding the phenomenon makes up the episode’s B-plot, discovering it to be two dimensional creatures heading towards a cosmic string which would tear the ship apart.  The B-plot is an example of a good B-plot, if one that is clearly underdeveloped due to the script having three distinct voices, and the resolution to that plot being what restores Troi’s empathic abilities as the status quo needs to be largely maintained in these episodes.  On the surface, the episode should be simple: focusing on the emotional fallout of a character becoming disabled is a bold and progressive choice for 1990.  Marina Sirtis plays Troi as incredibly distraught, fully committing to the loss of one of her senses and becoming an outsider among the crew due to the empathic abilities inhabiting a second nature of the character.  Where the script succeeds is at the raw emotion of the situation and the initial rejection of her friends’ sympathy.  That sympathy is portrayed as subconsciously ableist, and rightfully so, as a disabled person is not a broken person who needs fixing.  There is an almost immediate acknowledgement of certain myths about the disabled, such as the sharpening of other senses being unscientific for the reliance on other senses.  Sirtis’ performance is a powerhouse performance with this aspect of the material.  Troi throughout the first act is attempting to make adjustments but is not quite able to recover her ability pre-disability.

 

Absent are the question of accommodation for the lost sense, Troi as the ship’s counselor is expected to deal with part of her mind being forcibly removed on her own, which is the first sign of cracks within the episode as it moves past the first act.  This is made worse by how the other characters react to Troi’s condition.  There is an implication that these empathic abilities subconsciously put Troi above the other members of the crew, Riker even calling her aristocratic which reads as a substitution for having a superiority complex, which is not explored nearly enough.  This is the strongest aspect of “The Loss” after the first act even if it is incredibly shallow, only used as some flirting played wonderfully by Sirtis and Jonathan Frakes and ultimately dismissed.  There is a moment where Picard tells Troi that the loss of her empathic abilities just makes her the same as other counselors, something the episode frames as a disabled person being an inspiration for the able bodied.  This is particularly odd as earlier in the episode the script is clearly aware of this exact trope and why it is problematic, only to play the trope straight, a further indication of three writers contributing to the script.  This lack of accommodation could also have been integrated into the plot actively as a limitation of Starfleet’s structure, Troi as the only counselor is a problem as the episode clearly wants to position her as needing counseling as accommodation.  The loss of empathic abilities is used as an allegory for physical ability, using a science fiction based mental ability in its placed, and as the episode moves further away from the initial incident writers Hilary J. Bader, Alan J. Adler, and Vanessa Greene forget that Deanna Troi is still an adult with a neurotypical brain functioning in the same capacity as an adult, neurotypical human being.  “The Loss” posits that Troi is not a qualified counselor without these fictional empathic abilities, going so far as to make her incompetent and unable to perform her duties as counselor.  According to the script, she lacks basic human empathy.  A generous reading of the episode would have this be another aspect of the grief of losing the empathic abilities and the road to acceptance of that loss, overestimating how much her empathic abilities were relied upon.

 

Troi is paralleled with a recently widowed crewmember to explore how the road to cope with a loss, though a different type of loss, is one of ups and downs.  However, this is an episode that instead of showing Troi going on that journey, this is told to her by her coworkers.  Once again, Star Trek: The Next Generation infantilizes one of its few female characters, ignoring their own agency and failing to characterize them as a full adult capable of making her own decisions.  Were this just an extension of her grief, while it would likely not read as perfect it would be a softened blow.  Paralleling Troi with a widow clearly wants to show Troi not being able to see where she is making the same mistakes and focusing on the wrong details, but having her coworkers spell it out like this makes it worse.  It takes away Troi’s agency once again, continuing the clear pattern of the character.  Whoopi Goldberg as Guinan is included as pseudo-counselor since she is a bartender and yet from a performance standpoint Goldberg is almost uncomfortable with the role she is given here.  This is not because she cannot play the character, she has done in practically every previous appearance, but because on some level Goldberg understands what’s wrong with the script.  The episode then resolves itself; the breakthrough is incredibly short, lacking impact.  Troi gets some snippy lines towards Dr. Crusher to indicate a new confidence and the episode ends.

 

Overall, “The Loss” is an episode that uses more emotional manipulation.  Watching it the performances are obviously quite strong, strong enough that until writing this review I was even leaning towards positivity despite some rough edges.  Then you take the time to think about exactly what was being said after the first act and how Troi as a character is continually infantilized, losing any agency and being painted as an incompetent counselor as base state.  There is an implication of bigotry towards humanity that goes unexamined in favor of flirtation and a joke, while the script itself clearly has conflicting voices about how disabled people are meant to be viewed.  If it wasn’t for the first act’s genuinely progressive look at becoming disabled (at least for a 1990 episode of television), this would be among the absolute worst of the show, possibly even the franchise.  3/10.

Final Mission by: Kacey Arnold-Ince and Jeri Taylor from a story by: Kacey Arnold-Ince and directed by: Corey Allen

 

“Final Mission” is written by: Kacey Arnold-Ince and Jeri Taylor, from a story by: Kacey Arnold-Ince, and is directed by: Corey Allen.  It was produced under production code 183, was the 9^th episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation Season 4, the 83^rd episode overall, and was broadcast on November 19, 1990.

 

Wil Wheaton’s decision to leave Star Trek: The Next Generation is a moment in fandom that was unfairly celebrated.  Wesley Crusher is a character who entered the gestalt of pop culture as the prime example of an annoying child character who saved the day when the adults in the room failed to see solutions right under their noses.  This is a kinder stating of the sentiment early internet forums at the time displayed.  This assessment has issues.  While there certainly are episodes of Star Trek: The Next Generation where Wesley is responsible for saving the day, especially in the first season, this is due to the writing staff not knowing what to do with the character.  His journey to become an ensign and enter Starfleet Academy is a compelling character arc, Wheaton as an actor is allowed to grow even if he’d already proven himself as a competent actor with earlier film appearances such as Stand by Me.  Wesley Crusher is a character who works best when he’s allowed to be written as a child and not an adult in a child’s body or Gene Roddenberry’s self-insert.  Even subpar or mediocre episodes like “Coming of Age” are elevated by characterizing Wesley as a full character and not a sketch of what these adult writers think a child acts like.  Wesley’s exit from Star Trek: The Next Generation came about because on paper Wil Wheaton wished to pursue film opportunities, and the production staff of the show would not accommodate him.  Wheaton has spoken of other reasons for leaving, including emotional abuse from his father contributed to the decision.  His decision to leave, like Denise Crosby before him, is entirely due to being rightfully unhappy with choices made by the production team, usually placed at the feet of executive producer Rick Berman.

 

“Final Mission” opens with Picard informing Wesley he has been accepted into Starfleet Academy, he has two weeks to report and will be accompanying him on a final mission to mediate a mining dispute.  Picard and Wesley are joined by a Captain Dirgo, played by Nick Tate, while the Enterprise is taken to resolve a distress call involving a radiation leak and a mysterious spaceship as the B-plot of the episode.  The A-plot is the shuttle crashing onto a desert moon, cut off from the Enterprise.  The episode is a race against the clock to save themselves, Picard as the calm and rational man in a crisis while Dirgo is always on the knife’s edge of exploding.  Wesley is caught in the middle, “Final Mission” acting narratively as a final test for the character to see how far he has grown.  The weakest part of the episode is the B-plot, it’s perfectly serviceable and puts Riker in the spotlight but it is at this point a standard Star Trek plot.  The A-plot could also be described as a quintessential Star Trek plot where the dramatic tension is being put on the acting ability of Wil Wheaton to deliver on the episode’s premise.  Wheaton is up for it, Kacey Arnold-Ince and Jeri Taylor (Taylor more than Arnold-Ince) write plenty of material to examine how much he has grown and how much he still has ahead of him.  The more interesting elements are Wesley’s own need for paternal approval from Picard, the final line being Patrick Stewart giving Wesley that pride and approval.

 

Picard is not Wesley’s father, even if Picard and Dr. Crusher have chemistry, but he is the father figure in the child’s life.  The episode ends with this admission of pride, not a goodbye from Dr. Crusher to her son.  Crusher is in the episode, but Star Trek: The Next Generation would not be Star Trek: The Next Generation without leaving a female character with less to do than their male counterparts.  Dr. Crusher in this episode is part of the B-plot and only in the final act of the episode where she does get to be concerned for her son, Gates McFadden playing the material she is given quite well.  The shame is that there is not enough of the material to really excel at portraying the relationship between a parent and child.  A deeper reading of it and the previous episodes to include interactions between Crusher and her son as shallower than interactions between Wesley and his male counterparts.  Star Trek: The Next Generation is still a show largely made by men and “Final Mission” is a revelation of how it separates the relationship between father and son over mother and son as different and almost incompatible.  Indicating a rigid view of gender, Dr. Crusher is not a character who can provide the same type of pride and approval that Picard can to Wesley because she is a woman, he is a man.  She is his mother and could not understand the male psyche, while Picard can.  Jeri Taylor’s influence on this episode specifically makes that about the absence of the father Wesley never knew, however, the reflection on the series is there.  Picard gets the last word, Beverly barely gets one.

 

Overall, “Final Mission” works as a good exit for Wil Wheaton as Wesley Crusher.  There is certainly more care than the last time a cast member was being written out, Jeri Taylor’s position on the production team is certainly additive to the experience.  Wheaton’s performance is his strongest in the series, even if the script is doing in the greater scheme of television a basic final episode for a character.  Where it falls is the B-plot being largely uninteresting and not including enough of Dr. Crusher in a parental capacity except for worry and a brief scene at the end of reunion.  “Final Mission” is the definition of a standard good episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation.  7/10.

Reckless Engineering by: Nick Walters

 

The cover of Reckless Engineering is one of the more effective from the BBC Books.  An alteration of an 1857 photograph of Isambard Kingdom Brunel in front of the launching chains of the SS Great Eastern turned askew with head replaced by skull, the imagery evokes death and altered history.  The Eighth Doctor Adventures’ alternate timeline arc is alluded to by the specific edits made to the photograph while indicating an example of a celebrity pseudohistorical.  Nick Walters does eventually include Brunel as a character, though this is largely in the final act, as Reckless Engineering is another alternate present story following The Domino Effect, Time Zero, and to a lesser extent The Infinity Race.  On its surface, it shares a premise with The Domino Effect: the Doctor, Fitz, and Anji arrive on Earth where technological development has been arrested and society plunged into dystopia.  David Bishop puts this around the development of the computer through Sabbath’s intervention while Walters is far less specific, setting Reckless Engineering in a world where the initial alteration was far less violent.  The intervention is seemingly additive, an effort to preserve humanity, implied to be due to the end of The Domino Effect, causes a temporal acceleration.  The population of Earth is forced to age 40 years in the span of a few minutes, causing babies to suddenly become adults, the middle aged to suddenly die, and society to collapse.  Walters presents this in retrospect, setting the novel 150 years from the presumed divergence point.  Technology has not progressed, England has turned to religion for comfort, and there is a segment of humanity regressed to animalistic desires that are often shot sight.

 

Where the first half of Reckless Engineering succeeds is the exploration of setting, Walters paces the chapter breaks whenever a mini cliffhanger seems necessary.  The Doctor, Fitz, and Anji integrate themselves with the society from the perspective of it being an alternate 2003 and not the mid-1800s.  Walters does fall into the trap of bringing up Anji’s race almost as a lampshade while during much of the story pushing her aside as lost in the time vortex when fixing the alternate timeline becomes the focus on the plot, but she is great through the first half of the novel.  This is especially great since the Doctor and Fitz are explicitly paralleled, each taking a strong moral stance as the ‘reckless engineering’ of the title is not of Brunel, his engineering is lauded throughout as making the modern world what it is, but of the Doctor.  The Doctor is determined to correct the timeline as he would in every Doctor Who story with a similar premise.  The question becomes what if this “alternate” timeline is not alternate, that the aberration is what the reader and the Doctor would call the “proper” timeline.  Fitz becomes an advocate for this, even when Anji is thrown into the time vortex, with the evidence being that the alteration was created by an evolved species of human called the Eternine.  The alteration was simply trying to bring them into existence sooner rather than later.  Fitz and the Doctor have one of their biggest rifts in quite a few books over this, Fitz knowing that the Doctor is going to be condemning many of these peoples into unexistence.

 

Walters does falter, Malahyde, the poet possessed by the Eternine Watchlar, is in fact lying and the Eternine come from their own pocket universe.  This revelation does weaken the novel, Walters not sticking to his guns and softening the actions of the Doctor who becomes unraveled when his initial attempts to fix the timeline fail and Fitz begins to integrate into the alternate universe even by bringing Brunel to this future and Anji falling on the TARDIS in the time vortex.  Brunel in the TARDIS is an incredibly charming sequence, there’s something inherently charming of a historical engineer coming to terms with time travel and the Jules Verne aesthetics of the Eighth Doctor’s TARDIS.  Even Malahyde does an interesting switch from passionate poet to possessed villain.  Fitz integrating, however, barely lasts a chapter and these decisions are made in the final third of the novel.  There is too much setup getting there, yet the setup is not bad setup.  Walters’ supporting characters are strong with Aboetta as the point of view character allowing the reader to see the TARDIS team from the outside, often focusing on the Doctor’s blue eyes as visual purity for a deeply disturbed mind, almost creating this ghost of Sabbath hanging over the novel where he does not actually appear.  The Doctor since The Adventuress of Henrietta Street and Camera Obscura has become a darker figure despite his place as the protagonist and in the end as the hero.  His actions are controversial for a reason, and not exploring them more thoroughly is what holds back Reckless Engineering from greatness.

 

Overall, Reckless Engineering despite almost single handedly justifying the alternate universe arc after two particular duds, does fall flat by being limited into the 280-page count of the BBC Books line.  Walters spends almost too much time on setup for a bigger story, falling flat by not being able to explore all the ideas it proposes.  There’s enough here to make it a good novel, the Doctor’s arc being both what works best and leaves something to be desired by giving him a slightly more heroic sense of morality in the end of the book.  The historical aspects of the story do work well, but despite the cover they are actually in the background for much of the novel and it helps that Walters is doing something different with the alternate history idea here.  It helps get the series out of a mediocre spell of Eighth Doctor Adventures.  7/10.