Pages

Saturday, June 8, 2024

More Tribbles, More Troubles by: David Gerrold and directed by: Hal Sutherland

 


“More Tribbles, More Troubles” is written by: David Gerrold and is directed by: Hal Sutherland.  It was produced under production code 22001, was the 5th episode of Star Trek: The Animated Series, and was broadcast on October 6, 1973.

 

“The Trouble with Tribbles” was one of the best episodes of the original series of Star Trek, so it isn’t surprising that David Gerrold revisited the idea for Star Trek: The Animated Series.  “More Tribbles, More Troubles” despite being aired fifth, was actually the first animated episode to enter production, something that makes sense when you think about it.  It’s a follow-up to a popular, light-hearted episode that could easily ease the cast into the work of voicing animated counterparts to their live action characters.  “More Tribbles, More Troubles” is Gerrold attempting a sequel to a story and it feels as if much of this one was mandated to have specific callbacks to the original episode: the ending included Kirk and a Klingon both in separate piles of Tribbles, the multiplication problem makes it slightly easier to animate how many of the Tribbles there are, and the tension between the crew of the Enterprise and the Klingons. This leads to an episode that could never really capture the same imagination or ingenuity of the original episode, as is often the problems with sequels.  Gerrold makes this a direct sequel, it’s got a similar setting and the Enterprise is also delivering grain to the same system as in the original episode, but at least now the Enterprise and the Klingons know that Cyrano Jones is a conman, Stanley Adams returning to the episode in the role which is a very nice slice of camp for the performance.  Gerrold is able to elevate the script by having Jones genetically modify the Tribbles so they won’t multiply and has apparently developed a Tribbles eater, a glommer.  Gerrold's script is honestly the best thing about the episode, despite being derivative it's perhaps the most engaging episode of Star Trek: The Animated Series outside of "Yesteryear".

 

This is clearly an episode where the Tribbles are going to be a problem, instead of multiplying they eat the grain and begin to get bigger.  No doubt this was done to save on animation as it is easier to animate a growing Tribble over the multiplying variety.  The animation in this episode, while still of the same quality of the other episodes I have discussed thus far, is actually quite suited for the outright comedic style of the script.  There’s this genuinely funny visual gag where Kirk cannot sit in the captain’s chair because a giant Tribble is there.  It also helps that like “The Trouble with Tribbles”, “More Tribbles, More Troubles” has a strong conflict with the Klingons, even if that conflict is only one Klingon character because of budget and cast constraints (he is played by James Doohan.  The big twist is that the glommer wasn’t developed by Cyrano Jones,  but the Klingons and Kirk’s decision to give it back is one motivated by its uselessness against the larger Tribbles.  Shatner is clearly having fun running circles around the Klingon, even if it’s also clear this was an early episode that was recorded.  In fact the rest of the cast while helping still has that sense of getting used to voiceover with even Leonard Nimoy being a little off.  Somehow it is actually DeForest Kelley as Bones who while is still in a supporting role seems to be understanding the type of comedy episode he is in.

 

Overall, what saves and ultimately elevates “More Tribbles, More Troubles” is not originality, but the sheer quality of David Gerrold’s script as a writer.  It does the basic need of moving a sequel episode forward while slightly over relying on the aspects that worked the best in the original episode.  It’s when the visual callbacks happen that the episode doesn’t work as well as it could have, because even with that Gerrold is a writer who just captivates the audience throughout the 25 minutes that I once again would have loved to see this as a live action episode.  8/10.

No comments:

Post a Comment